视频简介
时雨是江家养女，也是江亦琛认为间接害死他母亲的罪人。她爱江亦琛，18岁那天因为日记的曝光，她的暗恋被赤裸裸的公之于众。 在江亦琛将她的日记扔在地上，视如草芥肆意践踏后，她才明白她爱的人永远不会喜欢她……。本片取材于曹雪芹所著古典小说《红楼梦》。宁国府贾珍的妻子有两个容貌美丽的妹妹。一个叫尤二姐，一个叫尤三姐。因为家里贫穷，和母亲一同寄住在宁国府的偏院里，依靠贾府过活。贾珍和他的隔房兄弟贾琏，常常找机会调戏这两位小姨。贾珍的儿子贾蓉，虽是小辈却也色迷心窍，夹在中间混水摸鱼。有一天，依靠贾府发迹的赖大做寿唱戏，尤氏姐妹也随母亲前去应酬。这天正好由柳湘莲串演《宝剑记》，柳湘莲原是破落的世家子弟，不愿意依附豪门权贵，他学剑串戏，生活飘泊无定。尤三娟对他的人品才貌大为欣赏。正在这时，贾珍父子和贾琏，却厚着脸皮与尤三姐纠缠。尤三姐讨厌这三个坏蛋，便离开戏场到花园散步。凑巧柳湘莲也因嫌恶薛蟠的胡闹，独自在花园中解闷，两人相见之下，谈得十分投机。不料薛蟠又追到花园胡闹，柳湘莲十分恼火，就把薛蟠痛打一顿，然后逃到外乡避祸。自从花园相会以后，尤三姐已爱上了柳湘莲，并抱定非柳湘莲不嫁的决心。贾珍父子为达到玩弄尤三姐的目的，由贾蓉穿针引线，用哄骗手段，帮了贾琏偷娶了尤二姐作偏房，并在花枝巷租了新房。本来尤三姐一直反对姐姐嫁给贾琏，但姐姐和母亲只希望生活有所依靠，不听她的劝告。尤三姐无可奈何，只得随同一起搬到花枝巷居住。一夜，贾珍探知贾琏不在花枝巷，便乘机溜进尤二姐的内房，对她调戏。尤二姐吓得逃到花厅向妹妹求救，尤三姐痛骂贾珍的无耻行为，要把他赶出去。恰巧贾琏回来，察情观色，已知贾珍来意，但又不敢得罪，反而吩附摆下酒菜，要尤三姐陪他们兄弟两人饮酒，想乘机劝诱尤三姐作贾珍的偏房。但尤三姐不像尤二姐性格懦弱，她性情高傲、性格倔强，此时此地看穿了贾琏的心计，忍住一肚子气，假意答应作陪，却借着酒意，把贾府的肮脏丑事，统统揭开，弄得贾珍、贾琏狼狈不堪、啼笑皆非。从此，他们把尤三姐看作多刺的玫瑰，再也不敢对她轻薄。贾珍、贾琏知道不能把尤三姐弄到手，留在家里又怕她闹出事来，便合计要将她嫁出去。尤三姐遂说出了她已爱上了柳湘莲，并折断玉簪，表示要嫁柳湘莲的决心。不久，贾琏因公外出，在途中的酒店里遇见了柳湘莲和薛蟠。原来薛蟠此次到外地做生意，遇到强盗，幸亏湘莲搭救性命，遂消除了被湘莲痛打一顿的仇恨。贾琏便向柳湘莲表达了尤三姐爱慕他的心意，愿替他们做媒。柳湘莲从见过三姐后，也常常思念她，就定了亲事，并将所带的“鸳鸯剑”作为聘礼。贾琏走后，薛蟠谈起贾府许多不肯相信。尤三姐有口难辩，内心万分痛苦，为表白她是清白之身，就在交还“鸳鸯剑”时，抽剑自刎，用死控诉了这个吃人的封建制度。。Herbert Vesely was one of the promises for a new German cinema already in the 50's, but after the 60's his star was already dimmed. He made a small number of films in the 70's and 80's, all non too good. This biography of Egon Schiele, one of the most important Austrian artists, is an example of the pretensions and emptiness of a Vesely-film of later date. The life of Schiele is presented here as a puzzle| well, Vesely thinks that Schiele's life was a puzzle: the core of the story is centered around the famous 1912 pornography trial and using this as base the film shows fragments of past and future. The problem is that it never becomes a unity and that the order of scenes and sequences seems to be at random: a cut-and-paste job that could have had any other result. Indeed, after seeing it twice I am almost convinced of it that a unsatisfactory linear thought-out film was changed into the puzzle in the editing room. Egon Schiele was an enigmatic man, but not a total puzzle, and this film does not bring him any closer. The films also fails in conveying the eroticism and meaning of the Schiele's paintings: the camera watches and glides over the models without any understanding of Schiele's intentions, we only see beautiful naked bodies. If interested in Schiele, you better buy a book with his works in stead.。